Strategic alliances in building construction: a tender evaluation tool for the public sector

Hampson, K and Kwok, T (1997) Strategic alliances in building construction: a tender evaluation tool for the public sector. Journal of Construction Procurement, 3(1), pp. 28-41. ISSN 1358-9180

Abstract

Building construction is a highly competitive and risky business. This competitiveness is compounded where conflicting objectives amongst contracting and subcontracting firms set the stage for an adversarial and potentially destructive business relationship. Clients, especially those from the public sector, need broader tender evaluation criteria to complement the traditional focus on bid price. There is also a need for change in the construction industry-not only to a more cooperative approach between the constructing parties-but also from a confrontationist attitude to a more harmonious relationship between all stakeholders in providing constructed facilities. A strategic alliance is a cooperative relationship between two or more organizations that forms part of their overall strategies, and contributes to achieving their major goals and objectives. Strategic alliances in building construction may provide a useful tool to assist public sector construction managers evaluate tenders and concurrently encourage more cooperative relationships amongst construction stakeholders. An overview of the Australian building construction industry is followed by a review of the existing strategic alliance literature and an analysis framework, comprising six attributes of strategic alliances for application to construction organization: trust, commitment, interdependence, cooperation, communication, and joint problem solving. These attributes are currently being used to collect data from 70 building construction firms in Queensland to assess their respective levels of strategic alliance. Given the trend towards broader indicators of construction firm performance, these attributes are proposed as a tool for use in the tender evaluation process for public works.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Australia, public sector, Queensland, strategic alliancing, tender evaluation
Index terms: Queensland, construction firm, strategy, commitment, building construction, problem solving, tender evaluation, construction manager, cooperation, business relationship, construction organization, alliancing, public sector, Australia, strategic alliance, subcontracting, competitiveness, public work, interdependence, public sector building, construction industry
Subjects: management, partnership management, organizational analysis, administrative law, industry analysis, profession, decision-making and reasoning, tendering, Geography, infrastructure engineering, market analysis, building construction, construction type, strategic management, organization, psychology, contractual arrangements
Topics: Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here