Blackwood, D J; Sarkar, S and Price, A D F (1997) A research methodology for modelling construction design service costs. Journal of Construction Procurement, 3(3), pp. 47-67. ISSN 1358-9180
Abstract
The increased use of fee competition by construction industry clients has caused providers of professional design services to review their fee estimation and cost control approaches. A research methodology for determining realistic fee estimates for design work using historic cost data is described. It became necessary for the focus of the work to shift from, what appeared at first to be, straightforward applied research to a more fundamental programme of research into design process management. The project is presented as a case study and highlights the difficulty in novel research work of identifying an appropriate hypothesis. The application of a grounded theory approach that facilitated the development of a suitable methodology from a standard research template is described and key decisions on the of selection the research techniques are explained and justified. The selection and integration of the research instruments are described and conclusions are drawn on the appropriateness of the methodological template to the research programme. Finally, the principal conclusion from the research work, that the potential for rationalization of design cost estimation exists but was limited by the availability of relevant data, is outlined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | design cost, estimating, questionnaire, research method, survey research |
| Index terms: | case study, estimation, grounded theory, design cost, research methodology, fee estimate, modelling, cost data, construction industry, design process, programme, survey, competition, questionnaire, cost control, integration, methodology, estimating |
| Subjects: | analytical methods, market analysis, theoretical framing, accounting and finance, research methods, financial and cost management, design methods, data collection methods, research design and methodology, industry analysis, project controls, organizational analysis, economics |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Time Control, Design Practice, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here