Price, A D F and Shawa, H H (1997) Risk and risk management in project related finance. Journal of Construction Procurement, 3(3), pp. 27-46. ISSN 1358-9180
Abstract
The concept of Project Related Finance is introduced along with the main issues that lending banks should take into account when providing a finance package. The use of Project Related Finance for funding construction projects in The United Arab Emirates (UAE) was investigated. The main areas of risk have been identified and the use of guarantees to shift specific risks to interested parties has been discussed. Based upon interviews with lending banks in the UAE, seven factors that have the most significant influence on the banks decision on whether or not to provide finance have been identified and used to provide an overall assessment. Three case studies were used to demonstrate the assessment process. Important aspects of Risk Management have been discussed along with a five-step decision making process for lending banks. A check list was developed and circulated as part of questionnaire to banks and contractors. The responses have been presented to illustrate the degree of acceptability of certain types of risk normally associated with construction projects. Banks consider many of the risks less acceptable than the contractors do. Banks are also more concerned than the contractors with respect to deficiency in working capital and adequacy of reserves. Both banks and contractors are especially concerned about the uncertainty of project completion and contractual matters.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | bank, finance, risk management |
| Index terms: | decision-making process, package, case study, funding, risk management, interview, guarantee, United Arab Emirates, contractual matter, construction project, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | production management, Geography, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, decision analysis, contract structure, contractual condition, data collection methods, risk assessment |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Procurement, Risk Management, Geographical Context, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here