Fortune, C and Hinks, J (1999) Quality issues in building project price forecasting: factors affecting model selection. Journal of Construction Procurement, 5(2), pp. 129-140. ISSN 1358-9180
Abstract
Clients considering the procurement of sustainable building projects as solutions to their accommodation problems are involved in making value-for-money business decisions. One dimension of such decisions is the need to take account of good quality early stage building project price advice. Quality in terms of the provision of early stage building project price forecasts for clients is explored in this paper, and a broader, more multi-stranded approach is advanced that will help to put current research efforts on the development of more accurate price forecasting models into context. In particular, the paper addresses one of these identified research themes, namely the selection of appropriate building project price forecasting model(s) for use. The extent to which practitioners fail to understand price-forecasting models is assessed in terms of the extent to which this creates a barrier to model selection. This is done by reference to the results of a large-scale quantitatively based study that was carried out with over two thousand three hundred practitioner organizations in England. Other, more positive criteria are identified that are suspected as affecting model selection. It concludes by developing a rudimentary framework within which the more influential of these selection criteria can be identified. It is anticipated that the eventual development of a tool to aid model selection by practitioners will contribute towards the provision of better quality building project price advice for clients.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | forecasting, price advice, modelling, quality, research theme |
| Index terms: | modelling, forecasting, value-for-money, England, price forecasting model, dimension, selection criteria, quality issue, sustainable building, practitioner |
| Subjects: | quality assurance, evaluation, analytical methods, Geography, prediction and forecasting, practitioner, economic analysis, sustainable construction, health monitoring assessment and metrics, tendering |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Procurement, Value Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here