An investigation into simulating the procurement process in the United Kingdom construction industry

Newcombe, R (2000) An investigation into simulating the procurement process in the United Kingdom construction industry. Journal of Construction Procurement, 6(2), ISSN 1358-9180

Abstract

This paper develops a contingency approach to the selection of an appropriate procurement path for construction projects in the UK construction industry. After a review of the recent UK literature and construction industry reports on procurement, the design, development and testing of a construction procurement simulator is described. A description of the simulator, which requires participants to select an appropriate procurement path for four different types of client, and the procedure for running it are outlined. The results of the testing of the simulator with a sample of 172 construction managers and professionals indicate that the selection of an appropriate procurement path is not as obvious as it sometimes appears and divergent choices are sometimes argued. It is argued that the development of a science of procurement, based on completing simple matrices of client and project characteristics, is unlikely to be realised. The simulator offers the opportunity to develop skills in analysing and translating a client's needs into an apposite procurement path. The results also confirm that exposure to a course of study in which procurement approaches are examined in detail improves the consistency of the selection process due to a predictable learning curve.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction industry, procurement, simulations, United Kingdom
Index terms: construction industry, testing, construction procurement, investigation, contingency approach, science, United Kingdom, procurement process, exposure, construction manager, construction project
Subjects: professional practice, contractual arrangements, specialized education, organization, production management, Geography, data collection methods, profession, industry analysis, public and environmental health
Topics: Health and Safety, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Education, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Organizational Design
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here