An investigation into predicting materials suppliers' profits

Nicholas, J; Holt, G D and Harris, P T (2000) An investigation into predicting materials suppliers' profits. Journal of Construction Procurement, 6(2), ISSN 1358-9180

Abstract

For the majority of construction contractors, materials suppliers provide an intrinsic form of working capital via the credit they furnish. Generally, in excess of seventy per cent of suppliers' turnover is accounted for by credit sales; thereby highlighting the importance of accurate contractor (creditworthiness) evaluation, and effective debt collection procedures. This research models suppliers' credit control and debt collection practices to predict the (average) annual profit that will result from purveying credit to a contractor. Suppliers must generate profit to ensure continued survival and retain investor commitment. Hence, understanding of potential profit enhancement would be welcomed, particularly, when one considers the volatile environment within which construction operates. Using multivariate discriminant analysis, data from a survey of UK suppliers' credit control and debt collection procedures is modelled. The developed MDA models portray good predictive performance (statistics), but their overall accuracy is hindered somewhat by the variability of the data; this results from the substantial differences in procedures implemented by suppliers' credit control and debt collection methods.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction contractors, credit risk, discriminant analysis, profit, materials suppliers
Index terms: investor, discriminant analysis, investigation, statistics, survival, variability, turnover, commitment, survey, accuracy, profit, construction contractor
Subjects: economic analysis, business management, environmental science, psychology, practitioner, statistical analysis, sociology, professional development, mathematical modelling, data collection methods
Topics: Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here