Panahi, B; Moezzi, E; Preece, C N; Zakaria, W N W and Rogers, J (2015) Predictor role of profession in explaining personal value priorities and conflicts between construction stakeholders. Construction Economics and Building, 15(4), pp. 45-62. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
This study investigated the relationship between “profession” and personal values to explain the potential conflicts between various groups of construction stakeholders. In this study, personal values of three professional groups of project consultants including architects, engineers, and quantity surveyors were assessed through questionnaire survey in the Malaysian construction industry. Using comparative analysis, the personal value priorities and conflicts between these professional groups of stakeholders were identified. The research findings indicated dissimilar patterns of personal values which explain potential conflicts between the stakeholders with different professions in the Malaysian construction industry. Therefore, this research confirmed the predictor role of “profession” variable in explaining personal values although this relationship was an ambiguous issue in the extant literature. This research, through identifying the value priorities of different groups of construction stakeholders, provides better understanding of their different needs, expectations, and preferences which would help project managers to have better perception of the potential conflicts between these groups of construction stakeholders.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction stakeholders; conflict; personal values; profession; project consultants |
| Index terms: | construction industry, preference, engineer, comparative analysis, survey, profession, quantity surveying, project manager, architect, personal value, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | institututions, decision-making and reasoning, data collection methods, profession, behavioral psychology, data analysis and analytics, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here