Ribeiro, F L (2001) BOT model: The Portuguese case. Journal of Construction Procurement, 7(2), pp. 72-86. ISSN 1358-9180
Abstract
The BOT model entails a concession company providing the finance, design, construction, operation, and maintenance of a privatised infrastructure project for a fixed period, at the end of which the project is transferred free of charge to the host government. In times of decreasing ability to raise funds for infrastructure projects, the BOT concept has been used by governments to implement privately financed construction projects. BOT mechanism offers increasing investment, construction, procurement, operation, and other business opportunities for private investors in infrastructure projects. However, under the BOT model, the responsibilities are heavy and stakes are high for both, governments and promoters. There are several constraints in successful implementation of BOT projects. The objective of the current study is to obtain feedback from government agencies (both central and local) on the current use of the BOT model in implementing infrastructure projects, and to examine current practice in Portugal by investigating theory and practice. Thus, a survey of the major government agencies, both central and local, was conducted in Portugal. This paper presents the findings of this survey and a review of seven concession projects. It shows that the most common BOT form used in Portugal is the Concession. Finally, it presents how the Concession concept is being applied through a review of the seven case studies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BOT, concession, Portugal, project delivery systems, RFP, survey |
| Index terms: | survey, government agency, promoter, construction project, Portugal, investor, case study, infrastructure project, implementation, project delivery |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, production management, Geography, data collection methods, project delivery, administrative law, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Procurement, Geographical Context, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here