Shen, Q and Liu, G (2002) Value management applications in China's construction industry. Journal of Construction Procurement, 8(1), pp. 35-47. ISSN 1358-9180
Abstract
This paper introduces a research survey to identify the current state of value management (VM) applications and to set up a benchmark for its future development in China's construction industry. The survey extensively solicited the views of designers and contractors regarding VM applications in the industry. The findings reported in this paper reveal the awareness and knowledge degree of VM among construction professionals, applications of VM in the construction industry, approaches adopted in VM practices, the output produced by VM and the major factors impeding its further development. Based on the survey results and relative discussion, an overall picture of VM applications in China's construction industry is drawn. It is argued that VM is still in its initial stage and many tasks have to be addressed to exert its huge potential in the construction industry. Although this paper concentrates on VM applications in the context of China's construction industry, the findings should be relevant to many developing countries, as they face similar problems in terms of promoting the application of VM in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | application, china, construction industry, value management |
| Index terms: | construction industry, construction professional, value management, designer, China, face, survey, developing country |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, profession, industry analysis, management, professional development, psychology, development economics, Geography |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, International Construction, Geographical Context, Value Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here