Miller, C; Packham, G and Thomas, B (2003) Inter-organisational relationships and their effect upon small construction enterprises in South Wales: Co-operation at a cost. Journal of Construction Procurement, 9(2), pp. 17-28. ISSN 1358-9180
Abstract
The culture of the construction industry often means that technological progression and innovative methods are failing to filter through the supply chain. It is documented that the construction industry in the United Kingdom trails foreign competition in terms of training and development especially within small firms. It is also maintained that processes such as partnering can arguably reduce costs within the construction process. These costs primarily arise due to a lack of harmonisation between contracting parties. Historically, this relationship has been transactional in nature, with both parties seeking to secure value added at minimal cost. Despite this fact, evidence suggests that mutual co-operation that can supersede a traditional cost led approach offers new hope for prosperity in the construction industry. It is argued that Industrial South Wales should be the focus of research due to the sectoral differences that exist together with the heterogeneity of the firms within the region. This paper provides preliminary qualitative research, highlighting that the competent implementation of mutually beneficial inter-organisational relations can only reduce transaction costs if the small subcontracting firm is fully integrated into the process. Thus, it is argued that harmonisation between large and small firms is a prerequisite for productive inter-organisational co-operation. The paper concludes that new practices will only have limited appeal to small subcontracting firms, if they continue to facilitate contractor opportunism instead of reducing the transaction costs of all stakeholders involved in the construction process.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | south wales, inter-organisational co-operation, construction industry |
| Index terms: | implementation, construction industry, subcontracting, contracting party, partnering, Wales, construction process, qualitative research, competition, evidence, United Kingdom, transaction cost, opportunism |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, partnership management, research design and methodology, business, financial analysis, building construction, market analysis, Geography, contractual arrangements, practitioner, organization, evaluation and assessment methods |
| Topics: | Procurement, Geographical Context, Supply Chain Management, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here