Rethinking construction: What about the SMEs?

Langford, D A; Abukhder, J; Murray, M; Hardcastle, C and Vernea, E (2004) Rethinking construction: What about the SMEs? Journal of Construction Procurement, 10(1),

Abstract

The UK construction industry suffers from a number of problems that inhibit its potential for increased productivity. These include inadequate profitability, an adversarial culture and a fragmented industry structure. The recommendations made in the Latham report and Egan Report represent the most comprehensive and co-ordinated attempt in many years to cure the industry ills. This paper examines the awareness that seventeen Managing Directors/ Senior Managers employed in Scottish based small and medium sized construction firms have of the 'Egan' agenda for change within the construction industry. The perceived impact, effectiveness and potential implementation of the Egan recommendations were analysed. Analysis of the interviews revealed that the most important recommendations were considered to be: i) clients should employ an Egan compliant contractor; ii) greater client focus; iii) the development of long-term partnership. Each organisations awareness of Egan agenda was classified using a three tier typology- "early adopters, slow followers and blissfully unaware". However, there was widespread scepticism concerning the precise overlay of the Egan targets to these organisations. This is not to say that the firms are antithetical to the use of targets to shape performance, but that they have constructed their own targets which fitted better their ambitions and culture.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: small and medium sized contractors, rethinking construction
Index terms: construction firm, interview, manager, partnership, productivity, Latham, construction industry, implementation, profitability, effectiveness
Subjects: industry policy reports, organization, practitioner, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, management, performance management, partnership management, industry analysis, data collection methods
Topics: Quality Management, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here