Pryke, S D (2004) Analytical methods in construction procurement and management: A critical review. Journal of Construction Procurement, 10(1),
Abstract
The pressure for reform bearing upon the construction industry has become overwhelming and some fundamental changes in the way that construction projects are procured and managed are taking place. The industry and its clients and commentators, as well as those engaged in research, need a means of analysing the changes being brought about within the industry. This paper reviews the current approaches to describing and analysing the procurement and management systems within construction. Some approaches are found to have merits in relation to the analysis of specific aspects of procurement or management (for example, critical path analysis effectively demonstrates the interdependence associated with individual project decisions). None of the existing approaches alone, however, provide a rigorous, quantitative analysis of construction procurement and management systems within the context of individual construction project coalitions. This paper concludes that social network analysis, although linked to a large body of quite complex theory, provides a quantitative and comparative methodology for analysing a number of characteristics within both traditional and new procurement approaches. The main issues are appropriateness of level of analysis, uniformity and non-hierarchical approach to visualisation, comparability across differing governance systems, ability to reflect a non-linear, complex, iterative and interactive process, and the growing importance of non-dyadic relationships.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analysis, management, procurement, social network analysis, visualisation |
| Index terms: | visualization, quantitative analysis, methodology, construction project, social network analysis, management system, interdependence, critical path analysis, construction industry, construction procurement, governance |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, organizational analysis, management, design practice, data analysis and analytics, business, production management, research methods, contractual arrangements, operations research |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Research Practice, Governance, Design Practice, Time Control, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here