Developing conditions of trust within a framework of trust

Smyth, H J and Thompson, N J (2005) Developing conditions of trust within a framework of trust. Journal of Construction Procurement, 11(2),

Abstract

Why is trust important? Projects are inherently uncertain, requiring a degree of trust in the contractor from the client. It is therefore important for the contractor to establish conditions of trust with the client at an early stage. The paper examines the conditions of trust within a framework of trust. The role of conditions of trust from the client perspective is analysed, using data derived from research underpinned by Butler's Conditions of Trust Inventory and applied to leading construction clients. Research data is derived from in-depth interviews and questionnaires. It shows what major clients consider to be the conditions for construction projects. An analysis from the findings shows how the conditions affect client perceptions of project risk, and hence (lack of) confidence in the contractor. Other research into antecedents of trust is evaluated. It is argued that the range of findings on antecedents is confusing, hence the conclusion that antecedents are difficult to establish and a more conclusive conceptual approach is the identification of components of trust, used with the conditions of trust. Trust and the other components belong to the same family of concepts, whilst not being antecedents. Finally, ways of managing the conditions of trust are explored, leading to recommendations for instigating and managing conditions to generate trust between client and contractor.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: antecedents of trust, conditions of trust, components of trust, dyad management
Index terms: construction client, inventory, interview, construction project, questionnaire
Subjects: data collection methods, practitioner, inventory management, production management
Topics: Project Management, Supply Chain Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here