Khalfan, M M A and McDermott, P (2006) Once unthought, now the best practice within the construction sector. Journal of Construction Procurement, 12(1),
Abstract
As the title of the paper suggests, what was once unthought within the construction industry, is now not only being thought but also being implemented and considered by public clients as the best practice within construction industry in the UK. Traditional procurement, resulting in an over-the-wall scenario, is being rejected by public sector clients and forward looking contractors. The situation is now changed and project participants are trying to demolish these 'walls' and are coming together to work as an integrated supply chain from the outset of a project. The Client's role within the whole process is quite crucial; this paper will show the contribution of public sector clients, taking the initiative not only to think but to implement the previously unthought in construction through new and innovative procurement routes. At the same time, the role of main contractors is also appreciable in adopting these new procurement approaches which were previously not among the best practices within the industry. This paper reports on the findings of two detailed case studies. It shows the techniques used by public clients - such as aggregation of demand and the establishment of longer term relationships - to bring about resultant changes in the supply side – including the involvement of subcontractors along side main contractors in various forms and degrees of integration. The paper concludes that contractors and subcontractors, now working under such innovative procurement umbrella have come within an integrated supply chain. In some cases, the first tier includes the Main Contractor, the Design team and M & E Contractors and they are all involved with the client from the outset of the project to develop the plans for the proposed projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | supply chain integration, partnering, UK |
| Index terms: | public-sector client, design team, subcontractor, construction sector, integration, traditional procurement, case study, partnering, main contractor, supply chain integration, construction industry, public client, best practice |
| Subjects: | practitioner, contractual arrangements, professional practice, partnership management, organizational analysis, sociology, industry analysis, data collection methods, business, supply chain integration |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Procurement, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here