Rutherford, N N S and Daniel, E I (2025) A systematic review of the barriers and attraction strategies for females in construction. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 178(3), pp. 140-150. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The construction industry is overwhelmingly male dominated and has a rapidly ageing workforce. Comprehensive research shows that women are being considered an untapped resource that can be used to fill the skill gap; however, numerous barriers are hindering women from either entering or progressing in the industry across the board. Globally, governments and organisations within the sector have implemented various attraction strategies considered effective solutions for dealing with gender disparity and lack of diversity. However, there are a limited number of studies available that provide a holistic review that incorporates data extrapolated to reveal geographical and thematic trends of the most common barriers and attraction strategies found in an endeavour to encourage females into the construction industry. This research seeks to bridge that gap by conducting a systematic review using Scopus, from which 51 journals were analysed using qualitative research design. It was identified that Australia has been at the forefront of conducting research in the last decade, and discrimination and apprenticeships/pre-apprenticeship programmes were strong factors impacting or influencing females and their career prospects in the industry. The study offers valuable insight for governments, human resources, educational organisations and self-employed individuals.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | apprenticeships; barriers; built environment; career progression; construction industry; discrimination; education; female; tradeswoman; UN SDG 10: reducing inequality; UN SDG 16: peace, justice, and strong institutions; UN SDG 5: gender equality; women; workforce |
| Index terms: | Australia, apprenticeship, women, human resource, gender equality, inequality, justice, discrimination, programme, strategy, career, construction industry, systematic literature review, qualitative research, journal, built environment, disparity |
| Subjects: | research dissemination and communication, research evaluation and metrics, legal systems, infrastructure and transport systems, industry analysis, professional education, social justice, project controls, management, sociology, Geography, professional development, professional ethics, research design and methodology |
| Topics: | Information Management, Urban Studies, Human Resources, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Time Control, Legal Issues, Education, Ethics, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here