Developing future skills for the engineering sector: evidence from the UK

Daniel, E I; Oshodi, O S and Marte Gomez, J (2025) Developing future skills for the engineering sector: evidence from the UK. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 178(2), pp. 65-75. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Shortage of workforce stifles innovation and increases project costs. Information gleaned from the literature shows that the ageing workforce and inability to attract young people are reasons for labour shortages in the engineering sector. To address this shortage, several countries have created various programmes, such as degree apprenticeship, to ease the process of recruiting, training and retaining young people. This study seeks to (a) uncover factors influencing the decision to sign up for degree apprenticeship programmes and (b) unearth the factors affecting the outcome of degree apprenticeship programmes in engineering. Interviews were conducted to address the research objectives of the study. The findings indicated that awareness, the Covid-19 pandemic, funding, incentives (financial and non-financial) and diversity are key factors influencing the decision to sign up for degree apprenticeship. Also, demand for engineering jobs, balance between theory and practical training, collaboration of stakeholders, leadership support and versatility of apprentice experience are the factors affecting the outcome of degree apprentices. Based on the findings, it is evident that raising awareness among stakeholders, such as career counsellors, and collaboration are vital for improving the supply of qualified young people in the engineering sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: built environment; education & training; workforce
Index terms: evidence, career, apprenticeship, collaboration, COVID-19, interview, project cost, programme, built environment, labour shortage, funding, pandemic
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, economic analysis, professional education, data collection methods, economics, health risk and incident analysis, management, professional development, project controls, infrastructure and transport systems
Topics: Health and Safety, Education, Supply Chain Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Time Control, Organizational Design, Urban Studies
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here