The comparative inclusion and acceptance of LGBT+ people in the UK construction industry

Chowdhury, M and Brooks, T (2024) The comparative inclusion and acceptance of LGBT+ people in the UK construction industry. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 178(1), pp. 41-49. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

The Equality Act 2010 forbids discrimination based on gender and sexual identity. However, many lesbians, gays, bisexuals, transgender people, non-binary people and people with gender expressions outside traditional norms (LGBT+) working in the UK construction industry experience hostility in the workplace. There has been a lack of research that focuses on LGBT+ professionals in construction, so this study investigates the topic and looks at how acceptance varies across different groups under the LGBT+ umbrella. The research uses thematic analysis to probe in depth the experience of 11 LGBT+ interviewees working in the UK construction sector. The study finds that the majority of the LGBT+ employees have experienced some prejudice, each group in a unique way. Bisexual, trans and non-binary people experience more discrimination than lesbian and gay people. Acceptance depends on the workplace context. The respondents perceive construction sites to be more linked to harassment, discrimination and inappropriate comments towards the LGBT+ community than office environments. The visibility of senior LGBT+ employees and the leadership of both LGBT+ and non-LGBT+ senior management are important for inclusion in organisations and for supporting junior LGBT+ employees. This study contributes to understanding of LGBT+ acceptance and raises issues that need to be addressed in the industry, challenging heteronormative culture.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; diversity & inclusion; equality; lgbt+; sexuality; wellbeing
Index terms: sexuality, identity, construction industry, construction site, well-being, thematic analysis, construction sector, discrimination, norms
Subjects: professional ethics, industry analysis, sociology, methods and analysis, work location, mental health and wellbeing
Topics: Health and Safety, Legal Issues, Research Practice, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here