Simukonda, W and Emuze, F (2024) Safety impacts of design for manufacturing and assembly techniques in off-site construction. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 178(1), pp. 16-24. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
Design for manufacturing and assembly (DfMA) is an approach for improving project safety performance. For off-site construction (OSC), the philosophy is increasingly becoming a preferred design approach for OSC components. However, studies examining the safety impact of DfMA in OSC are limited. This study investigated the potential effects of DfMA techniques on mitigating specific safety hazards in OSC. A literature review identified and paired DfMA techniques and the safety hazards that they mitigate. Empirical data were collected using a survey to assess the identified relationships. Data were analysed using a combination of frequencies, inferential statistics and Cronbach’s alpha. Most respondents agreed that DfMA techniques control their pairwise safety hazards in OSC. To eliminate safety hazards and limit their socio-economic impact, contracting organisations engaged in OSC need to consider the application of DfMA in the manufacturing, assembly and disassembly processes of OSC. The study reaffirms the importance of implementing evidence-based DfMA techniques for mitigating safety hazards in developing countries where OSC is an emerging philosophy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; design for manufacturing & assembly; developing countries; off-site construction; safety hazards |
| Index terms: | socio-economic impact, literature review, philosophy, survey, developing country, disassembly, contracting organization, safety performance, evidence, becoming, off-site construction, statistics |
| Subjects: | building construction, philosophical process, development economics, operations management, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, occupational health and safety management, philosophical studies, data analysis and analytics, mathematical modelling, data collection methods, economic and policy analysis |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Site Management, International Construction, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here