Murtaza, I; Rashid, M U and Asad, M (2024) Construction safety challenges and opportunities at design stage for building industry. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 178(1), pp. 3-15. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The implementation of design for construction safety (DfCS) at the early design phase can proactively identify and address potential hazards in construction projects. By integrating safety considerations into the design process, it becomes possible to eliminate or minimise risks before they become costly and dangerous issues which can also be avoided during construction. To gain insights into the current practices and barriers faced by professionals in the construction industry of Pakistan regarding DfCS, a comprehensive study was conducted. This study utilised a combination of questionnaire-based surveys and interviews to gather data from various stakeholders involved in the design and construction processes. The research revealed that DfCS was absent in the standard design practice. The weaknesses identified for the implementation of DfCS were designers’ inevitable doubts about increasing costs, schedule problems, absence of contracts and regulations and designers’ lack of safety knowledge and skills. The largest influential factors were regulatory liability on the designer (29%) and increasing costs (27%). The study found that 59% of site accidents were due to less trained workers. Of the respondents, 87% suggested revision of contracts and regulations. This study proposes a framework for checking constructability with respect to safety standards. An alternative project delivery method – that is, design–build – is recommended to reduce health and safety accidents and barriers.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction; construction management; design; economic growth; management; safety; UN SDG 3: good health and well-being; UN SDG 8: decent work |
| Index terms: | survey, health and wellbeing, design process, health and safety, liability, interview, construction safety, safety standards, design stage, questionnaire, regulation, construction project, Pakistan, influential factor, designer, design practice, project delivery, constructability, economic growth, implementation, construction industry, design and construction, design phase, building industry |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, professional practice, liability law, design process, health safety and environment, Geography, production management, economic development, project delivery, design methods, mental health and wellbeing, profession, risk assessment, data collection methods, political science, environmental health, industry analysis, occupational health and safety management, construction integration |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Procurement, Risk Management, Design Practice, Research Practice, Governance, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here