Johansen, K W; Hong, K; Schultz, C and Teizer, J (2024) Automated quantification of construction workers’ exposure to falling object hazards. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 177(4), pp. 207-222. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The construction industry is among the most hazardous industries, and its continuously changing and complex environment results in a labour-intensive task of planning and preventing hazards. Current manual safety planning procedures cannot keep up with construction progress. This leads to unplanned durations and an increased responsibility for the individual workers to analyse and act accordingly to an emerging situation. This work proposes an automated approach to identifying and measuring the amount of struck-by falling object hazard exposure to construction tasks and their assigned work crews. Additionally, falling objects can originate from activities not foreseen or planned due to planning resolution (e.g. crane lift paths or temporarily impassable access routes). Therefore, it is investigated how to extend the current practices of safety analysis in both the planning and construction stages using building information modelling artificial intelligence and sensor techniques. The proposed strategy is to identify hazard sources and subjects based on their topology and nature in a spatio-temporal analysis. The proposed combinatorial analysis approach is validated in a case study performed on a real construction project in Finland. It yields new insights, which can be necessary for construction sequence decisions and convincing workers to improve their safety behaviour.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | automated prevention through design & planning; building information modelling (BIM); digital twin for construction safety; dynamic safety analysis; hazard exposure identification & dissemination; health & safety; information technology; safety & hazards; spatio-temporal safety analysis |
| Index terms: | duration, prevention, construction industry, resolution, construction worker, construction stages, artificial intelligence, Finland, safety behaviour, quantification, building information modelling, case study, digital twin, exposure, construction safety, information technology, topology, construction project, dissemination, strategy |
| Subjects: | production management, Geography, financial risk, geometry and topology, practitioner, digital engineering, industry analysis, environmental health, information systems, conflict resolution, project controls, occupational health and safety management, measurement and scaling, knowledge translation, management, public and environmental health, artificial intelligence, project delivery, computing systems, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Project Management, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Time Control, Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here