A phenomenological inquiry of Building Information Modelling macro-adoption in Uruguay

Olivera, E L; Booth, C; Agyekum, K; Al-Tarazi, D and Pittri, H (2024) A phenomenological inquiry of Building Information Modelling macro-adoption in Uruguay. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 177(3), pp. 137-149. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Building information modelling (BIM) application in the architecture, engineering and construction (AEC) sectors has received attention, particularly in most Global North countries. However, there is a dearth of literature on its application in the Global South context. This research explores insights into the uptake and use of BIM in the Uruguayan AEC sector and proposes recommendations for accelerating its adoption. This study adopted the phenomenological research design. Through interviews with experts, this study relies on phenomenological analysis of a purposely sampled group of (n = 7) experts in BIM in the Uruguayan AEC industry. The discoveries and findings confirm that BIM is still at an early stage of maturity, and many practitioners still need to be convinced of its benefits. Therefore, pilot projects and the development of BIM guidelines are essential to align industry procedures and demonstrate the benefits of implementing BIM to convince hesitant professionals and increase levels of adoption. Furthermore, organisations' main implementation drivers are external forces such as client requirements or the need to acquire a competitive advantage. This study's findings imply that BIM diffusion dynamics in Uruguay are more aligned with a top-down approach, thus highlighting a design for 'push' by authorities such as the government. Overall, this study fills a research gap in the Uruguayan AEC industry and provides an academic reference background for policymakers for future actions. The paper is of value, as it contributes to the current state-of-the-art BIM research by drawing insights from the AEC industry in a typical developing country context.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: AEC industry; building information modelling (BIM); macro-adoption; phenomenological insights; UN SDG 11: sustainable cities and communities; UN SDG 12: responsible consumption and production; UN SDG 3: good health and well-being; UN SDG 6: clean water and sanitation; UN SDG 8: decent work and economic growth; UN SDG 9: industry, innovation and infrastructure; Uruguay
Index terms: economic growth, implementation, water and sanitation, client requirements, dynamics, sustainable city, research design, Uruguay, building information modelling, competitive advantage, consumption, state of the art, practitioner, developing country context, health and wellbeing, drawing, interview
Subjects: Geography, urban design, economic development, market analysis, consumer economics, practitioner, research dissemination and communication, contractual arrangements, socioeconomic context, professional development, systems engineering, environmental health, information systems, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, research design and methodology, technical documentation
Topics: Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Sustainability, Procurement, Information Management, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Governance, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here