Agyekum, K; Pittri, H; Botchway, E A and Dompey, A M A (2024) Key attributes of designers' competencies for design-for-deconstruction implementation. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 177(3), pp. 117-126. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
Successfully integrating design for deconstruction (DfD) principles into the construction industry will require articulated design guides and designers' competencies. This calls for understanding the attributes of designers' competencies essential for effective DfD implementation. This study explored the attributes of designers' competencies for DfD implementation in the Ghanaian construction industry. The study adopted an exploratory sequential mixed-design method with an initial qualitative data collection phase followed by a quantitative data collection phase. Responses from the qualitative phase (through interviews) were thematically analysed, while data obtained from the quantitative phase were analysed using mean scores and standard deviations, the normalised value test and the Mann-Whitney U test. The study identified ten attributes of designers' competencies for DfD implementation. The four key competencies were identified as, in order of importance, proper expertise and motivation, designers' knowledge of material quality and durability, strong understanding of construction and effective coordination of element and component dimensions. The results of this study shed light on a less explored aspect of competencies for DfD implementation in the construction sector, particularly in the global south. It provides fresh data and new insights into the attributes of designers' competencies for DfD implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | competencies; construction; construction & demolition waste; demolition; design; design for deconstruction; exploratory sequential |
| Index terms: | durability, deviation, designer, implementation, construction industry, dimension, design method, coordination, motivation, key attribute, interview, demolition waste, construction sector |
| Subjects: | management, industry analysis, design methods, risk assessment, profession, data collection methods, health monitoring assessment and metrics, material degradation and durability, financial and cost management, waste management, contractual arrangements, psychology |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Human Resources, Risk Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here