Design for safety among design professionals in the Botswanan construction industry

Rantshilo, K; Mahamadu, A M; Agyekum, K; Cheung, C; Manu, P and Yunusa-Kaltungo, A (2024) Design for safety among design professionals in the Botswanan construction industry. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 177(1), pp. 27-38. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Design has been identified as a contributor to adverse occupational safety and health (OSH) outcomes in construction. Despite this, relatively few studies have focused on design for safety (DfS) within developing countries, Botswana being a prime example. This research investigated the extent of DfS implementation in Botswana’s construction industry and the factors that affect its implementation. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among design professionals (i.e. architects and civil/structural engineers) in the Botswanan construction industry. The data were analysed using both descriptive and inferential statistics. The results revealed that a majority of respondents are aware of the concept of DfS and respondents generally consider DfS to be of high importance. Furthermore, there is a high willingness to apply DfS and a high interest in undertaking DfS-related professional development training. However, engagement in DfS practices is rather moderate and participation in DfS professional development training is low. Moreover, DfS legislation, as well as industry guides, is considered by designers to be the most influential factor for DfS implementation in Botswana. From the results, recommendations are given, including the inclusion of DfS requirements in OSH legislation and provision of DfS industry guides by the relevant design professional bodies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction management/design/health & safety/UN SDG 3; decent work and economic growth/UN SDG 9; good health and well-being/UN SDG 8; industry, innovation and infrastructure
Index terms: architect, occupational safety and health, implementation, construction industry, economic growth, statistics, professional development, Botswana, designer, influential factor, structural engineer, design for safety, developing country, legislation, health and wellbeing, survey
Subjects: legal systems, contractual arrangements, economic development, health safety and environment, Geography, development economics, data collection methods, risk assessment, profession, mathematical modelling, mental health and wellbeing, professional development, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis
Topics: Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Procurement, Risk Management, Legal Issues, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here