Ramachandra, T and Rotimi, J O B (2015) Causes of payment problems in the New Zealand construction industry. Construction Economics and Building, 15(1), pp. 43-55. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
Payment delays and losses persist in the construction industry and continue to be a key concern to industry practitioners. Therefore an exploration of the key causes of payment delays and losses is undertaken in this study with the ultimate objective of seeking mitigating solutions. The study adopted a survey approach using an online questionnaire, administered to practitioners from the New Zealand construction industry, comprising consultants, head contractors and subcontractors. The data obtained was analysed using inferential statistical techniques, including comparing means and factor analysis. Factor analysis enabled clustering of the inter-related causes of payment delays and losses in order to find reduced number of causes. Accordingly, the study found that payment problems mainly relate to contractual issues, financial strength of industry players, disputes, short-comings of payment processes and 'domino effects'. Among them, the financial strength of critical industry players was considered central to payment problems. The study concludes that any solution to these problems must address these primary causes, as a rational starting point. Thus procuring a feasible form of financial security at the outset of a project, and the pre-qualification of the financial status of critical project participants, were found to be significant in the mitigation of construction payment risks.Paper Type: Research article
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | New Zealand; payment problems; causal factors; construction; factor analysis |
| Index terms: | pre-qualification, exploration, mitigation, New Zealand, practitioner, factor analysis, questionnaire, construction industry, dispute, clustering, survey, subcontractor |
| Subjects: | financial risk, practitioner, dispute resolution, Geography, tendering, data collection methods, statistical analysis, industry analysis, data science, environmental resource management |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Cost Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here