Gorse, C; Stafford, A; Shenton, D M; Johnston, D; Sutton, R and Farmer, D (2012) Thermal performance of buildings and the management process. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
From the limited information that exists on the thermal performance of dwellings there is growing evidence of a significant gap between that which is predicted and the built product. Such differences between the intended and actual measured performance are not accepted nor tolerated in other industries. The differences in the performance can be considerable, with some buildings experiencing deviation from designed thermal transmittance resulting in twice the heat loss expected. This does not bode well for the industry when new dwellings are expected to achieve zero carbon standards by 2016. Although some of the problems are related to inadequate design, many are attributable to construction processes. Using the technical reports and feedback from researchers engaged in forensic investigations of building performance, this paper presents some general observations and some re-occurring problems associated with the management of the construction process. Specific areas of concern include the interface between design and construction, sequencing and planning of works, quality of workmanship and build, and lack of quality control systems. Due to current environmental and energy concerns, emphasis has been placed on improving the efficiency of the building system to ensure the gains expected are delivered. Much of this relies on the production of quality building fabrics that provide passive solutions, which maintain thermal comfort and reduce the level of service intervention.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building quality; coheating tests; thermal performance; workmanship and zero carbon standards |
| Index terms: | building performance, deviation, investigation, evidence, thermal performance, efficiency, thermal comfort, level of service, workmanship, design and construction, construction process, quality control, building system |
| Subjects: | contractual condition, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, performance measurement, environmental engineering, energy systems, quality assurance, project delivery, evaluation and assessment methods, financial and cost management, building construction, engineering systems, performance management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Contract Administration, Quality Management, Sustainability, Site Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here