Productivity and industrial relations in the Australian construction industry

Loosemore, M; Alkilani, S Z and Luperdi, S (2021) Productivity and industrial relations in the Australian construction industry. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 175(4), pp. 167-176. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

The global construction industry has a poor productivity record compared with other industries. While there have been many studies into the factors that influence construction productivity, the role of industrial relations (IR) in construction productivity has been neglected. This is despite countries with highly unionised workforces, such as Australia and Canada, often attributing the industry's relatively low productivity to its confrontational IR environment. This paper explores how construction project managers and operatives in Australia interpret what has become a highly divisive IR debate and how this influences their IR behaviour. A survey of 92 construction project managers and operatives reveals multi-theoretical perceptions influenced by both pluralist and radical IR theories. While unions are seen as beneficial to project safety and work hours, they are perceived as detrimental to productivity, although there is uncertainty about how this relationship works. It is concluded that improvements in construction project productivity are unlikely to be achieved by IR legislation alone but through a more complex multidimensional bargaining lens where project managers and operatives develop mutually beneficial shared solutions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: government; project management; risk & probability analysis
Index terms: legislation, manager, probability analysis, survey, construction project, industrial relation, project manager, productivity, Canada, Australia, bargaining, global construction, construction productivity, construction industry, project management, operative
Subjects: statistical analysis, industry analysis, project management theory and practice, economics, management, profession, data collection methods, Geography, production management, legal systems, operations management, psychology, practitioner, strategic management
Topics: Supply Chain Management, Legal Issues, Geographical Context, Project Management, Organizational Design, International Construction, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Business Strategy
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here