Thajudeen, S; Lennartsson, M and Elgh, F (2020) Identification of challenges and success factors in industrialised house building design. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 175(1), pp. 27-37. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The transformation from a traditional to an industrialised house building system requires a strong focus on the design phase, as several factors must be considered and the decisions taken impact both productivity and the value created for customers. The main purpose of this study is to explore the existing challenges and outline the critical success factors to be considered in the design phase of industrialised house building. A multiple-case study was conducted by linking five Swedish timber-based house building companies using different building systems. Empirical data were gathered from 27 semi-structured interviews. The findings contribute to an increased understanding of the existing challenges and knowledge on the critical success factors in the design phase by classifying them into internal and external factors. Moreover, the building system is considered a bridge linking both, and these factors can be used as a decision making support tool for the evaluation and validation of the design solution. Therefore, individual support for the prioritised factors is critical for achieving an efficient design process. The results show that fixed production, not the building system, is crucial for identifying success factors. Finally, manufacturability and assembly factors were identified as prioritised and generally important factors in industrialised building.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | buildings, structures & design; design methods & aids; management |
| Index terms: | design phase, manufacturability, industrialized building, decision-making, critical success factor, building system, productivity, design process, design method, case study, industrialized house-building, validation, transformation, success factor, interview |
| Subjects: | professional development, health monitoring assessment and metrics, control systems, building construction, data collection methods, manufacturing engineering, management, engineering systems, construction type, decision analysis, design methods, business, professional practice |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Health and Safety, Project Management, Risk Management, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here