Laryea, S; Watermeyer, R and Govender, N (2020) The influence of fees on the quality of professional services in South Africa. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 174(4), pp. 163-173. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The abolishment of the tariff of professional fees in the construction industry is a growing international trend since the late 1980s. In recent years, this has become a topical issue among built environment professionals in South Africa following a ruling by the Competition Commission in 2016 that prohibits professional councils from publishing a tariff of fees. The period following the ruling has coincided with a perceived decline in the quality of professional service outputs, which some have attributed to the lowering of fees resulting from market competition. However, this may not necessarily be true, as other factors also influence quality. This research examined the claims through the lens of professionalism theory, which asserts that professionals have a standard-of-care obligation that is not dependent on fees. The examination of data across 15 different professional services disciplines in a new universities project demonstrates that market competition led to fee offers that were lower in comparison with the tariff of fees published by built environment professional councils. However, the professionals delivered a high standard of work, which further challenges the claims that lower fees lead to a decline in the quality of professional service outputs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | developing countries; procurement; tendering |
| Index terms: | built environment, construction industry, developing country, professional service, competition, professionalism, South Africa |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, professional development, organization, market analysis, Geography, development economics |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, International Construction, Urban Studies, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here