Whitmore, D; Papadonikolaki, E; Krystallis, I and Locatelli, G (2020) Are megaprojects ready for the Fourth Industrial Revolution? Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 174(2), pp. 49-58. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
Complex projects and megaprojects are increasingly shaped by new enabling technologies and new demands from businesses, including how people are treated when working on these endeavours. This is often referred to as the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR). Project leaders and practitioners are not fully leveraging the opportunities unlocked by the 4IR, and project performance shows little sign of improvement despite the highly innovative and collaborative environment that the 4IR stimulates. This paper discusses this challenge and concludes that a significant reason why these benefits are not being realised is because there is a competence gap in both the project leader and practitioner communities. These communities are attempting to deal with twenty-first-century issues using competences, toolsets and a mindset created 100 years ago. Significant developments in competences associated with the 4IR in general are required. In this paper, specific competences are proposed and justified: collaborative working including people, process and digital components; lean six sigma; and agile. Success will be to empower the people who deliver megaprojects such that they are able to deliver the planned social value to all stakeholders involved.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | information technology; management; project management |
| Index terms: | mindset, six sigma, information technology, megaproject, practitioner, competence, project management, complex project, social value, fourth industrial revolution, project performance |
| Subjects: | computing systems, technology adoption, project management theory and practice, personnel development, performance measurement, sociology, health behaviours and lifestyles, practitioner, strategic project management |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Quality Management, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here