Opoku, A; Tallon, A; Lok, K L; Chen, C X L and Umar, T (2020) Realising project benefits in the public sector: Project sponsor's perspective. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 174(1), pp. 7-13. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
Managing the realisation of project benefits in public sector organisations is fundamental in ensuring that value is added by projects and programmes. Project sponsors are charged with championing projects in organisations to create value in line with the organisational strategy. This study examines how the sponsor defines project benefits, aligns them with organisational strategy and ensures that they are delivered. The paper presents the results of a case study involving a major public sector organisation in the UK using qualitative data collection through interviews with 14 sponsors across the business. It also confirms that sponsors must be empowered and held accountable in order to create meaningful value for an organisation. No business organisation can survive without creating value for customers, and therefore project sponsorship is an essential function of organisations. The findings from this research will enable the case study organisation and similar public sector organisations to become a more 'intelligent client' and ensure that all investment is aligned with the wider organisational strategy. It contributes to knowledge in the broader research base by building a clearer understanding of how public sector organisations employ the sponsor function to ensure that projects align well with the business strategy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | business; infrastructure planning; project management |
| Index terms: | infrastructure planning, project management, case study, public sector, organizational strategy, project sponsor, interview, public sector organization, programme, business strategy |
| Subjects: | strategic project management, project controls, sociology, administrative law, project management theory and practice, data collection methods, business |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Time Control, Project Management, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here