Talabi, B; Edum-Fotwe, F and Gibb, A (2019) Personal attributes of supervisors: Are these the key to transforming construction safety in the UK? Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 172(3), pp. 101-111. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The UK construction industry accounts for a disproportionately high number of major and fatal injuries. The industry has a poor worker safety record, and several stakeholders have made efforts to improve its performance. Much of such efforts have, however, targeted reactive control measures. Research indicates that there is a positive correlation between a proactive alternative-safety behaviours-and safety performance. These behaviours are shaped by the personality of individuals or determined by their social sphere of interaction, including supervisors. Thus, the role that the supervisor plays in influencing the behaviours of front-line workers (FLWs) was investigated. Using a survey and statistical tests, the perspectives of FLWs were obtained and analysed, respectively, to establish the vital supervisors' qualities that improve their safety behaviours. The emerging qualities were found to rank from highest to lowest potential as follows: Integrity/trust, openness/transparency, genuine care, accountability, flexibility, respect, fairness, consistent high personal standards, ability to empower and beliefs. The findings from this study suggest that organisations can improve their safety performance by focusing on the aforementioned qualities in three stages. The findings also highlight the need for organisations to focus on subtle but significant human qualities that are often ignored in safety management.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | health and safety; management; statistical analysis |
| Index terms: | statistical analysis, safety behaviour, personality, integrity, fairness, transparency, interaction, construction industry, supervisor, health and safety, injury, survey, accountability, safety performance, statistical test, safety management, construction safety |
| Subjects: | health safety and environment, leadership, behavioral psychology, liability law, practitioner, professional development, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, industry analysis, statistical analysis, environmental health, data collection methods, data science |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Organizational Design, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here