The ethics deficit in occupational safety and health monitoring technologies

McAleenan, P; McAleenan, C; Ayers, G; Behm, M and Beachem, Z (2019) The ethics deficit in occupational safety and health monitoring technologies. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 172(3), pp. 93-100. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Wearable and implantable technologies that enhance human capacity have opened up new opportunities to go beyond the replacement of lost capabilities to the provision of capacities to predict and potentially influence individual behaviour. Technologies, currently present on construction sites, either monitor location and transmit safety, health and well-being information to a central point or gather bioinformation on workers that can be read and interpreted to determine the physical and psychological stress states and ostensibly predict what may happen to the workers or how they may behave next; improving efficiencies. However, what appears absent is a sufficient exploration of the ethics underpinning the research and the morality in the application of these technologies in the industry, which may go well beyond the intent of the originators of the technology. Research into wearable and implantable technologies must take into consideration the broader impacts of the societal application of the work in the context of respect and equal consideration. This paper discusses how an international exercise, carried out to determine the extent to which researchers and contracting companies have examined the ethical and moral implications of the use of these technologies, discovered deficits in considering the impacts on worker competence, agency and reciprocity.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: corporate responsibility; health and safety; information technology
Index terms: ethics, exercise, efficiency, psychological stress, occupational safety and health, morality, monitoring, construction site, health and wellbeing, corporate responsibility, health and safety, replacement, information technology, agency, competence, exploration
Subjects: personnel development, performance management, occupational health and safety management, sociology, health conditions and diseases, control systems, computing systems, mental health and wellbeing, business, work location, health safety and environment, materials science, health behaviours and lifestyles, ethical practice, environmental resource management
Topics: Quality Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Governance, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here