An analytical review of failed water public-private partnerships in developing countries

Tariq, S; Zhang, X and Leung, R H M (2019) An analytical review of failed water public-private partnerships in developing countries. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 172(2), pp. 60-69. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Developing countries have adopted public-private partnerships for water infrastructure utilities because of rapid urbanisation and economic growth along with the public sector's lack of capital and technical capacity. However, water public-private partnerships have shown mixed results; many of them have encountered problems and even failed. Motivated by such failures, this study aims to explore the reasons behind failed water public-private partnerships in the last two and a half decades. Cases of 16 failed water public-private partnerships from different developing countries and regions have been compiled and thoroughly investigated, which disclosed a number of potential failure reasons: soaring tariffs, non-payment of bills, incapability of the public sector, poor technical performance of the private sector, macroeconomic instability, conflicts between public and private sectors, social and political opposition to privatisation, lack of transparency, fluctuations in exchange rates, change in related laws and others. The failure reasons identified are further analysed to develop their causal interrelationships through event mapping. Outputs of this study would facilitate stakeholders of water public-private partnership in taking appropriate actions to overcome these failure causes and ensure the success of future projects.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: developing countries; failure; public-private partnerships
Index terms: mapping, developing country, privatization, economic growth, transparency, private sector, partnership, public sector, utilities, urbanization
Subjects: construction type, economic analysis, urban planning, development economics, spatial and geospatial analysis, economic development, professional development, administrative law, industry analysis, partnership management
Topics: Sustainability, Legal Issues, Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here