Enhancing value for money in public procurement of Northern Ireland construction projects

McArdle, G and Gunning, J G (2018) Enhancing value for money in public procurement of Northern Ireland construction projects. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 171(5), pp. 207-219. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to evaluate public procurement in Northern Ireland (NI) - more specifically, the achievement of value for money (VfM) in public construction projects. Other areas assessed were factors detrimental to creating VfM, subeconomic/abnormally low tendering and the potential impact of Brexit in NI. The methodology included primary and secondary data collection. Secondary data, through a literature review, identified gaps in knowledge in the study area. Primary data were collated using a mixed-methods approach. The qualitative research involved six semi-structured interviews to collate the data and use of the Decision Explorer software program to analyse these. Quantitative research was in the form of 81 questionnaire responses, analysed using the SPSS software program. The findings highlight influences that create VfM in public procurement, along with barriers to achieving VfM. Direct and indirect factors that contribute to public value are also established. Additionally, the potential impact of Brexit on VfM was ascertained. The research identifies clear implications for practice, with a view of increasing VfM through public procurement procedures. An insight is provided into public procurement in NI from the perspective of both vendor (public bodies) and purchaser (contractors) - an area that appears to be under-represented in current literature.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: procurement; sustainability; tendering
Index terms: interview, literature review, questionnaire, methodology, qualitative research, construction project, program, value-for-money, quantitative research, Northern Ireland, purchaser, secondary data, public construction, public value
Subjects: building construction, physical geography and landforms, research methods, production management, evaluation, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods, research design and methodology, sociology, political science, software systems
Topics: Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Value Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here