Building material price differentiation across geographic locations in South Africa

Windapo, A and Moghayedi, A (2018) Building material price differentiation across geographic locations in South Africa. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 170(6), pp. 243-254. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

This study examined the price of building materials and whether there are significant differences in the prices across South Africa and between retailers. The rationale stems from reports that there is a differential in building material prices across South Africa. However, it is not known whether location is a key factor in the price differentials. The research employed a quantitative approach. The data gathered were analysed using geographic information system (GIS) technology. The research established that there was significant variation in building material prices across South Africa and between retailers, and that when distributed by provinces, the relationship between price and distance varies between inverse and direct and is somewhat significant. Based on these findings, the research concludes that the distance of the retailer from the manufacturer is a weak predictor of price in a location, and recommends that further studies be undertaken to develop a model for use in explaining location differentials in national project procurement. The study contributes to the discussion on how recent developments such as the GIS technology can be used in identifying the areas in which there are building material price differentials, leveraging more economical infrastructure projects and proposing alternative innovative construction technologies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: logistics/management/materials technology
Index terms: variation, project procurement, differentiation, South Africa, materials technology, manufacturer, building material, construction technology, geographic information system, infrastructure project
Subjects: Geography, geographical techniques and analysis, materials science, practitioner, organization, digital engineering, contractual arrangements, contractual condition, infrastructure and transport systems, building materials
Topics: Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here