Sadullah, M; Ghazali, M and Rashid, A (2018) Critical success factors in a public–private partnership highway project in Malaysia: Ampang–Kuala Lumpur elevated highway. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 170(6), pp. 234-242. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The Ampang–Kuala Lumpur Elevated Highway, which is also known as Akleh, is the first elevated highway-infrastructure project that has been procured in Malaysia through the public–private partnership approach. Even though the construction stage of the project has taken 5 years to complete, which is much longer than what is required for a normal construction project, Akleh was successfully commissioned for operation in 2001. This paper identifies and ranks the critical success factors of the first elevated highway-infrastructure project in Malaysia. All the key contributing factors that have been identified can be grouped into five critical success factors. All factors are ranked from the most critical factor that has the most impact on the success of the project. Extensive interviews with key personnel from both the project’s clients and the project concessionaire were carried out to establish what those involved in the project considered to be the critical success factors, and produce a ranking of those factors. As a result, project implementability, judiciary government control and transparent procurement process are among the most prioritised critical success factors. Effective management control, good communication between project parties and stable political situation are identified as the top three contributing factors.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | public–private partnerships/procurement |
| Index terms: | concessionaire, critical factor, infrastructure project, partnership, judiciary, procurement process, project party, personnel, critical success factor, interview, highway construction, Malaysia, construction project |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, sociology, Geography, partnership management, management, contract type, control systems, legal systems, data collection methods, production management, contractual arrangements, infrastructure and transport systems, civil engineering |
| Topics: | Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Human Resources, Geographical Context, Legal Issues, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here