Implementation of level 2 Building Information Modelling strategy for asset procurement

Kumar, B and Hayne, G (2017) Implementation of level 2 Building Information Modelling strategy for asset procurement. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 170(5), pp. 190-206. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Despite the availability of Building Information Modelling (BIM) technologies for well over a decade now, their widescale adoption has been largely limited to the design stage for model authoring. The ultimate benefits from BIM have so far eluded the wider stakeholders at the project level and ultimately the end clients in any significant way. It is now accepted that the BIM technologies, on their own, would never achieve the overall benefits for the end clients as they potentially could. To address this, level 2 (L2) BIM has been proposed as an approach to BIM-based asset procurement as a set of processes, standards and contractual protocols for effective information management throughout the life cycle of an asset. This paper presents the implementation of the L2 BIM approach for a large asset-owning organisation, NHS Scotland. An approach for the application of current knowledge on L2 BIM in a practical scenario with a view to it being replicable by other organisations is proposed. A set of challenges that may arise in practice and pointers on how to address them are also outlined. In addition, a stepped approach for transition from level 1 to level 2 BIM is also suggested.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling (BIM); design; procurement
Index terms: Scotland, authoring, implementation, building information modelling, life cycle, design stage, strategy
Subjects: contractual arrangements, professional practice, Geography, value management, management, coding, information systems
Topics: Business Strategy, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here