Delatte, N J (2017) Challenges of civil engineering megaprojects in North America. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 170(4), pp. 161-166. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
In many respects, megaprojects define the civil engineering profession, going back to the Panama Canal and the Hoover dam. They present many challenges. By definition, they are large, innovative projects that have never been done before. The Boston Central Artery/Tunnel and the San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge are now in service and by all accounts are performing well. However, these both had large cost overruns and concerns about quality and lengthy construction delays. The Central Artery/Tunnel also suffered a fatal ceiling collapse. Megaprojects require careful management. Owners and builders must be transparent and responsive to open record requests. Public employees should be empowered to bring forward concerns about quality and safety issues. The agencies should establish reliable open channels of communication with the public. Cost estimates should consider risk and provide for both best and worst cases. Independent inspection agencies should be established to provide oversight of large projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractmg; corrosion; quality control |
| Index terms: | owner, agency, corrosion, megaproject, safety issue, inspection, Panama, canal, profession, cost estimate, quality control, builder, tunnel, cost overrun, construction delay |
| Subjects: | sociology, institututions, financial and cost management, project controls, quality assurance, infrastructure and transport systems, financial risk, project delivery, Geography, material degradation and durability, strategic project management, practitioner |
| Topics: | Construction Materials, Cost Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Quality Management, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here