Bird, R and Wearne, S (2017) Contract structure for nuclear power projects. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 170(3), pp. 131-137. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The UK government chose an unusual contract structure for the procurement of their programmes of civil nuclear power projects. British manufacturing and construction companies were invited to form consortia to compete for "turnkey" contracts to design and supply complete power stations. The government continued with this structure until late in their second programme of projects. The results met the objective of national independence in power supply, but at a cost. This paper reviews the structure used in the UK, its evolution through two programmes of projects and lessons to be learned for new projects. The paper draws on published material, official papers, private records and reports from other countries. The most important lessons are that project sponsors should give rigorous attention to the choice of contract structure when initiating such major projects and that the structures open to them are not unique to their industry.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting; management; nuclear power |
| Index terms: | programme, construction company, project sponsor, nuclear power, power station, evolution, major project, contract structure, consortium |
| Subjects: | organization, strategic project management, contractual arrangements, environmental science, infrastructure and transport systems, sociology, project controls, partnership management, energy systems |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Business Strategy, Time Control, Procurement, Sustainability, Project Management, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here