Stakeholders' role in improving Ghana's construction safety

Donkoh, D and Aboagye-Nimo, E (2017) Stakeholders' role in improving Ghana's construction safety. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 170(2), pp. 68-76. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Health and safety (H&S) management has traditionally been the responsibility of the contractor. Most often, contractors are blamed for the accidents and other ill health that occur on their construction sites. H&S performance is, however, enhanced when there is effective collaboration between those involved in the construction process. This paper therefore explores the role of stakeholders in promoting construction H&S in Ghana through public works procurement. The four main stakeholders identified and evaluated in this study are the government, the client (employer), the contractor and the employee(s). Seven interviewees (comprising procurement managers, consultants and quantity surveyors) from public institutions in Ghana participated in the research. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews and were thematically analysed. Results indicate a conflict in the perceived functions and relation of these stakeholders in the construction process. To address the constraint to improving construction H&S, certain recommendations are offered. These include the identification of specific individuals responsible for supervision and employee training, the development of H&S policies by the government and contracts that clearly outline the contractual obligations of all parties involved. Additionally, the specific roles and involvements of other stakeholders in the procurement process in improving construction H&S are also outlined.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: government; health & safety; procurement
Index terms: manager, health and safety, collaboration, Ghana, public work, construction safety, procurement process, interview, construction process, construction site, supervision, quantity surveying
Subjects: building construction, practitioner, environmental health, control systems, work location, infrastructure engineering, Geography, contractual arrangements, management, health safety and environment, profession, data collection methods
Topics: Organizational Design, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Project Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here