A chronographic protocol for modelling construction projects

Francis, A (2016) A chronographic protocol for modelling construction projects. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 169(4), pp. 168-177. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

The main goal of graphical modelling is to communicate information clearly and effectively through graphical means. Little research has been undertaken in the domain of construction scheduling. It can be noted that there is no standard graphics protocol; therefore, it is up to each individual planner to set his or her own standard. This paper develops a new chronographical conceptual framework that describes all the elements required to perform construction operations, their processes, their logical constraints and their association and organisational models. The protocol studies the suitable visual parameters and their associated values in order to define a standard graphical presentation using shapes, sketches, codes, text, textures and colours. This protocol aims to overcome the current difficulties with graphical visualisation of the considerable amount of data needed for effective planning and to increase the effectiveness of visual research based on human visual habits. The validation process was performed using case studies that evaluated visual data and assessed the necessary mental effort required to find information on the schedule. The graphical convention of textures and colours has already been validated. The results have clearly demonstrated that this convention helps to simplify the process of searching for information on the schedule.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modelling (BIM); modelling; planning & scheduling
Index terms: construction project, construction scheduling, effectiveness, scheduling, protocol study, planner, conceptual framework, habit, validation, visualization, construction operation, building information modelling, modelling, case study
Subjects: construction operations, theoretical framing, health behaviours and lifestyles, data collection methods, profession, project controls, operations research, information systems, professional development, design practice, qualitative and interpretive research, analytical methods, performance management, production management
Topics: Research Practice, Time Control, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Site Management, Quality Management, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here