Challender, J; Farrell, P and Sherratt, F (2016) Effects of an economic downturn on construction partnering. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 169(4), pp. 159-167. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
Over the economic downturn in recent years, there has been a trend for construction clients to revert to traditional competitive procurement strategies. This is despite authoritative calls for an increase in collaborative working and partnering practices, heralded as the means to drive efficiencies and innovation. Clients may feel that the only way to assure themselves that they are not paying too much is to market-test their projects in a highly competitive environment. This study seeks to provide an insight into the effects of the recent economic downturn on collaborative working, with particular emphasis on manifestation in the practice and the positioning of trust within such relationships. Eight interviews were carried out with senior industry professionals, all experienced in partnering and collaborative working practices. Individuals have responded with a quest for job security, which has in turn developed risk-averse work practices and affected the establishment of short-term collaborative relationships. Organisations have returned to traditional competitive procurement methods, seeking to reduce risk in their practices and maintain control in uncertain times. Sceptical considerations of collaboration have re-emerged; the abuses of collaborative relationships for financial benefits, employing austerity as leverage, have become contemporary legend if not fact.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | communications & control systems; contracting; project management |
| Index terms: | interview, austerity, control system, collaboration, work practice, procurement strategy, construction client, working practice, efficiency, procurement method, partnering, project management |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, economic analysis, practitioner, partnership management, monitoring and control, project management theory and practice, management, performance management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here