Mitropoulos, P and Sanchez, R (2016) Criteria and considerations for project work structuring. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 169(3), pp. 124-130. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
'Work structuring' refers to the design of the project organisation and includes how the work is divided into work packages and how the work packages are assigned to different subcontractors. Work structuring determines the scope and complexity of each work package as well as the dependencies between work packages and the need for coordination between the project participants assigned the different work packages. This study investigates the work structuring criteria that project managers use to decide the breakdown of the project scope in work packages. Data were collected on three projects through interviews with project managers and review of project records. The findings identify two major sets of factors influencing the work structuring: (1) commercial considerations, including the owner's requirements and criteria such as budget pressures; requirements for use of local, disadvantaged and minority contractors; prequalification requirements; and licensing. (2) Production considerations including design factors, the difficulty and complexity of the work, interfaces and coordination requirements, the quality of the subcontractors who will be attracted by the work packages and potential production problems. These factors often create conflicting requirements and trade-offs that can affect project performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contracting/procurement/project management |
| Index terms: | design factor, subcontractor, complexity, licensing, project organization, interview, project management, coordination, project scope, project performance, minority, owner, package, project manager |
| Subjects: | organizational theory, contractual arrangements, scope management, practitioner, knowledge transfer, systems engineering, sociology, project management theory and practice, management, design practice, profession, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Procurement, Ethics, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here