The 'transaction X-ray': Understanding construction Procurement

Aitken, A and Paton, R A (2016) The 'transaction X-ray': Understanding construction Procurement. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 169(3), pp. 115-123. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

This paper presents the results of a case study, the Construction Case, which examines procurement practices within the UK construction supply chain and compares these with a more general UK sample taken from non-construction sectors. Using a qualitative methodology, the approaches to relationship management and buyer value perception are graphically mapped, using an innovative 'transaction X-ray' technique. The Construction Case considers procurement transactions conducted at various points along the construction value chain: The client, the construction firm and the specialist contractor. Recognising that the research design favours a small sample size, and thus limits generalisability beyond the boundaries of the case, the paper finds that construction industry procurement operates in an adversarial and largely arm's-length manner. While procurement practice is found to share common aspects with other industrial sectors, the case demonstrates that the construction industry is more adversarial and less collaborative than is the average found across the other sectors examined. The paper outlines a useful framework whereby construction practitioners can evaluate elements of procurement practice within their own organisations, and also signposts the required direction for future research in order to reflect the gap, suggested by the case, between current normative theory and construction procurement practice.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: management/procurement/tendering
Index terms: construction sector, boundaries, methodology, specialist contractor, construction firm, construction practitioner, construction industry, relationship management, construction procurement, construction supply chain, research design, sample size, value chain, case study
Subjects: property law, contractual arrangements, practitioner, organization, research methods, construction logistics, research design and methodology, data collection methods, industry analysis, professional development, value chain strategy, management
Topics: Human Resources, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Legal Issues, Supply Chain Management, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here