Khalifa, M; Farrell, P and Emam, H (2015) The concept of partnering in public–private partnership projects in the United Arab Emirates. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 168(6), pp. 277-284. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
The construction industry is known for poor performance and adversarial relations between its participants; traditional procurement processes based on competitive tendering are often blamed for this deficiency. Partnering was introduced in the literature as an approach that encourages co-operation across contractual boundaries. After two decades, it has arguably not been as successful as was hoped. This paper investigates the perception of contractors participating in public–private partnership (PPP) projects in the United Arab Emirates to enhance partnering implementation processes. The study focuses on project-level interactions on PPP projects. Two projects were examined in the field research as case studies through qualitative interviews with a total of five key personnel, in addition to collecting relevant data from contractors’ archives. The research identified agreements on some of the claimed advantages of partnering such as improved performance, optimum use of resources and improved client satisfaction. However, there was no consensus regarding many features of partnering, including co-operation, improving relations and developing trust between parties. This was attributable to the inadequate experience among project teams, the lack of management leadership and the gap between management and project teams’ perceptions of partnering. The research concluded that leadership, training and clear definition of responsibilities between the partners are among the main success factors for partnering projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | procurement; project management; public–private partnerships |
| Index terms: | partnership, traditional procurement, partnering, case study, implementation, interaction, construction industry, project management, agreements, project team, client satisfaction, success factor, interview, personnel, competitive tendering, United Arab Emirates, boundaries |
| Subjects: | client relations, contractual arrangements, property law, Geography, tendering, behavioral psychology, data collection methods, project delivery, health monitoring assessment and metrics, contract formation, project management theory and practice, management, industry analysis, partnership management |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Human Resources, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Legal Issues, Procurement, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here