Using tacit knowledge in training and accident prevention

Aboagye-Nimo, E; Raiden, A; King, A and Tietze, S (2015) Using tacit knowledge in training and accident prevention. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 168(5), pp. 232-240. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

Tacit knowledge plays an invaluable role in construction and has been labelled as the 'most strategically important resource' in organisations. Microconstruction firms rely heavily on the tacit knowledge acquired by their workers when managing site safety. Unfortunately, the importance of this knowledge is sometimes overlooked due to its inexpressible and informal nature. This paper investigates how microconstruction firms use tacit knowledge to prevent accidents on site, thereby improving overall site safety. An ethnographic approach was used to gather rich in-depth qualitative data on the practices of these 'hard-to-reach' microconstruction firms. Five case studies were conducted in the East Midlands region of the UK. Findings from the case studies suggest that workers of microconstruction firms use tacit knowledge in areas such as training newcomers and also identifying and managing imminent risks and dangers on site. Additionally, tacit knowledge plays an important role in safety communications among the workers of these microfirms; it helps establish shared understanding and a common sense of achieving their goals. This research sheds light on an underexplored area of the construction industry, which is arguably crucial in preventing accidents and ensuring the well-being of site workers.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: education & training/health & safety; knowledge management
Index terms: tacit knowledge, knowledge management, well-being, accident prevention, construction industry, case study
Subjects: mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, professional development, environmental health, industry analysis
Topics: Research Practice, Information Management, Sustainability, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here