Allport, R J (2015) Pre-implementation planning: The weak link in rail projects 1. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 168(5), pp. 205-212. ISSN 17514304
Abstract
Increasingly, authorities put major infrastructure projects centre-stage in their plans and strategies and invest scarce resources in them; indeed, the number and scale of projects is increasing. It therefore matters that they achieve their objectives, for if they do not, what then? This paper considers the evidence for urban rail (metro) systems drawing on the author's experience and research supplemented by published evidence. Too often, these projects fall short, particularly in delivering operational success. The weak link in project development is shown to be the pre-implementation planning phase, particularly the early days. This is when decisions have major downstream implications and unless well informed and managed result in consequential inevitable problems. This paper identifies issues with common practice and defines a practical agenda for planning improvement. Often, this requires a greater investment in planning effort and deferring commitment to a project until this decision can be made with confidence. The prescriptions recommended are shown to have much in common with insights from a report by the UK National Audit Office, subsequently addressed. Finally, this paper considers their relevance to the UK's major infrastructure project - HS2, which is a different scale of investment - and finds that they are likely to be relevant.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | infrastructure planning; management; sustainability |
| Index terms: | infrastructure project, commitment, drawing, implementation, strategy, project development, railway construction, audit, prescription, evidence, infrastructure planning |
| Subjects: | civil engineering, project delivery, management, technical documentation, evaluation and assessment methods, psychology, contractual arrangements, medical science and clinical practice, performance measurement, strategic project management, infrastructure and transport systems |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Health and Safety, Procurement, Quality Management, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here