Public-private partnership implementation: Cross-case analysis

Costantino, N and Pellegrino, R (2015) Public-private partnership implementation: Cross-case analysis. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 168(4), pp. 164-176. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate and analyse how public-private partnerships (PPPs) have been adopted across the world and their characteristics, both in developed and developing countries. This will provide insights that are expected to facilitate better practices in future PPPs in general, and consequently could be very useful for practitioners who want to improve the models currently used and those approaching PPP for the first time. This study uses a multiple case comparison methodology. With a focus on exploring how PPPs are implemented across the world, 33 case studies of PPP projects from various countries and sectors examine three of the most important aspects characterising a PPP transaction: the risk transfer to the private partner, the use of private financing, and the use of private expertise and management skills. Observations from case studies show that both developing and developed countries have almost the same behaviour in terms of risk transfer to the private party and use of private expertise and management skills in PPP projects, while different behaviour is evident for the use of private financing, which is much higher in developed countries than in developing countries.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: private finance initiatives; procurement; public-private partnerships
Index terms: implementation, case study, partnership, developed country, practitioner, cross-case analysis, methodology, private finance initiative, financing, developing and developed country, developing country
Subjects: partnership management, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, economic development, research methods, development economics, practitioner, contractual arrangements, economic analysis
Topics: Procurement, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Research Practice, International Construction
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here