Drivers for managing sustainability-related knowledge

Renukappa, S; Egbu, C; Suresh, S and Mushatat, S (2015) Drivers for managing sustainability-related knowledge. Proceedings of Institution of Civil Engineers: Management, Procurement and Law, 168(2), pp. 66-75. ISSN 17514304

Abstract

As organisations try to meet sustainability challenges, they need to be innovative. This often calls for the creation, use and exploitation of new knowledge. Therefore, knowledge resources must be properly managed to enable wellinformed decisions. There is, however, little empirical research on the key drivers for managing sustainability-related knowledge in the UK industrial sectors - which is the core aspect of this paper. For this study, four industry sectors: energy and utilities, transportation, construction and not-for-profit organisations were considered, based on the environmental, social and economic impact on UK society. A semi-structured interview method was used to collect industry perception, which was then analysed at both aggregate and sector levels using content analysis for inference and conclusion. The data analysis revealed four key drivers that have fuelled the need for managing sustainabilityrelated knowledge. They are: to improve access to knowledge associated with sustainability initiatives, to identify knowledge assets associated with sustainability initiatives, to improve the flow of knowledge associated with sustainability initiatives and to capture key knowledge associated with sustainability initiatives. The paper concludes that identifying and understanding the key drivers for managing knowledge within the context of sustainability is a complex process. Before embarking on a knowledge management journey, decision makers have to understand what they would like to achieve with their knowledge management programme and what value it needs to add to their organisation in the context of sustainability.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: corporate responsibility; knowledge management; sustainability
Index terms: exploitation, utilities, aggregate, economic impact, knowledge management, society, industry sector, corporate responsibility, data analysis, sustainability challenge, interview, programme, profit, content analysis
Subjects: business, data collection methods, data analysis and analytics, management, professional development, project controls, industry analysis, construction type, environmental issues, materials science, economic analysis, financial analysis, communities and social development
Topics: Governance, Construction Technology, Stakeholder Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Time Control, Sustainability, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here