Kusljic, D and Marenjak, S (2012) Evaluating political aspects of success for PPP/PFI sports hall in Croatia. In: Smith, S D (ed.) Proceedings of 28th Annual ARCOM Conference, 3-5 September 2012, Edinburgh, UK.
Abstract
Private Finance Initiative (PFI) is used to deliver public services that are not commercial in nature (e.g. public schools or public health care). Naturally Public sector Clients want to achieve successful PFI projects and they need to a have tool for evaluating achieved success. Due to fact that PFI projects are often capital projects, they have essential development purpose and attract lot of political attention. Possibility of measuring political aspects of PFI project success for Public sector Clients is explored. Important success criteria called
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | public-private partnerships; private finance initiative; project success; Croatia |
| Index terms: | partnership, capital project, success criteria, public services, private finance initiative, public-sector client, public health, Croatia, public school, project success |
| Subjects: | strategic project management, environmental health, contractual arrangements, Geography, assessment methods, sociology, administrative law, project management theory and practice, educational institutions, partnership management |
| Topics: | Project Management, Procurement, Legal Issues, Education, Geographical Context, Stakeholder Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here